Psycho, Dexter

Sunday’s episode of Dexter was a lot of things, but above all it was very, very good.  As I have said, this season of Dexter is, in my opinion, the strongest since the second.  I want to clear that up before saying anything else because the tone of the rest of this may seem distinctly negative.

Warning Spoilers Ahead!

Dexter had a very different feel in its most recent episode, especially the scenes involving Travis and Dexter.  I was wondering why this was happening, why the episode was a tale of two stories that is, until the big reveal at the episode’s end.

As Travis slowly crept across his hotel room, or Dexter lurked in the dark corners of the church there was a nagging feeling of déjà vu.  It seemed that the episode was channeling its inner Hitchcock.

Of course, this is an easy assumption to make given the Psychoesque way the episode ended.  Still though, there was something about the way that the camera refused to pan closer or further from Colin Hanks and Michael C. Hall that was unnerving even before the big reveal took place.

This job was done quite expertly.  What’s really weird though is that Dexter stole the cinematic style from Psycho, before ripping off that movie’s main plot device.  A move that is either brilliant or pathetic.  I choose to go with brilliant though.

The episode’s homage to the suspense genre, which went so far as to incorporate a 50’s style suspense-noir score during its final moments, was not exactly thinly veiled, but it did accomplish it’s task.  It allowed the story to progress, in exactly the way the writers wanted, without having people call foul on the Psycho (or Fight Club) thievery.

It really is a brilliant thing to be able to do something un-original and get away with it in today’s world filled with cynical viewers, but I think the obviousness of the, let’s say, homage, is what makes the episode immune to that type of scrutiny.

I just have one question about this episode though.

Is it trying to take the place of another niche favourite?  One that has been temporarily put on hold to make room for a series adaptation of John Grisham’s The Firm, a reboot of The Munsters, and an as yet untitled Hannibal Lector series?

The charming little show that I am obviously making reference to is of course TV guide’s new cover-gracers, NBC’s Community.

I say this as a joke, but really, really think about it.  If Dan Harmon and his writers team were given a crack at producing just one episode of Dexter, don’t you kind of think it would have ended up like this?

Sure, there’s more to Community than overly obvious movie themed references, and there was more to this episode of Dexter than just a Psycho parody.  But, the end of this episode would have perhaps been the most meta thing to exist outside of a Charlie Kauffman picture had Community not made that particular act their bread and butter, and that, cannot be ignored.

As far as the other story lines f the episode go, everything was fairly status quo.  The department’s newest edition (Billy Brown) was under used.  There is a weak, and overly ominous story line involving the department’s new intern, which needs to proceed or die.  Quinn is Quinn.  And Jennifer Carpenter gives a performance that she hasn’t been able to unleash on us since mid-season four.

If the series is to progress much further it will have to do so on the shoulders of this story line, and the acting of Jennifer Carpenter.  The show realized that a kill of the week and some possible light at the end of Dexter’s tunnel, which just turns out to be a carrot tied to a stick on his forehead, will not be enough to keep the audience’s full attention.  It hasn’t since the second season and the show has tried to fill that void with celebrity guest stars instead of developing a new plot.

To really draw the audience in, the show cannot ask for outside help. It has star power.  All of the current leads are more than capable of emotional captivation they simply require the space to do it.

Dexter

Is it just me or is Dexter in its finest form since season 2?  I probably wont catch any flak for saying that this season tops the laughable Smitts or underwhelming Stiles seasons, but I’m sure that quite a few people will point out that the Lithgow carried season 4 deserves some recognition.

The problem with season 4, and seasons 3 and 5 for that matter, is that it wasn’t really Dexter.  It was a show based on characters appearing in Dexter.  The story was strong and Lithgow was a great villain, but the show had lost its magic.

Through the first two seasons Dexter was a work of art by every aspect of the word.  It was more than jut story-telling, it was a full-out assault on all of the senses.  And it did this better than any show on TV.

Visually it was better than 99% of movies.  The kill scenes with the ice truck killer, and the artwork of the almost forgotten Jamie Murray season 2 antagonists Lila, were unlike anything else that had ever aired on TV.  But it was more than that.  The actors were aloud to show their talent more; the cinematographer was given a more creative role, and the dialogue was sharper.

During this time, saying that any show was on the same level as Dexter was ludicrous.  However, for the last three years some other serial dramas, mainly on AMC, have crept up and dethroned Dexter as the best show on TV.  The reason for this though is not because of anything they did, rather, it is the fact that after its two inaugural seasons, Dexter became content to simply tell stories.  Not exactly a wise choice since Mad Men and Breaking Bad do that virtually perfectly.  But that is why there is reason to be optimistic about this season.

Although the show is only five episodes into the season, and it is impossible to say that this season will be it’s strongest in four years, all indications do point that way.  The writing has regained some of the poetic swagger that it has been missing for quite some time and Michale C. Hall’s narration, which was growing tiresome in the previous three seasons, is back to its captivating form that made the show so special early on.

The performances of Mos Def and Colin Hanks are a refreshing reminder that you don’t have to be john Lithgow to be an effective guest star.  Not that Lithgow did a bad job, the problem was the character of Arthur Miller who ended up stealing the screen from the show’s star.

Thus far neither Hanks nor Def (that naming convention doesn’t seem right but let’s just go with it) have tried to take the show from Michael C. Hall.  Instead they have each become part of the world that Dexter observes but never fully touches.  They never break through and fully develop into characters.  This may seem like a negative thing, but I promise you, it is not.

Dexter Morgan is a strong enough character to carry the show.  The show is about him.  He’s titular.  What the show doesn’t need is more characters injecting themselves into the mix.  Dexter lacks the ability to delve into who a person is beyond anything superficial, and we should be the same.   For Dexter to work it has to be both funny and macabre, a difficult line to tread, but it also has to allow the audience to slip into the character of Dexter themselves.  If the show does not do this, it resorts to simply telling stories.

Clip from season 2